From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: Gerard Jungman <jungman@lanl.gov>
Cc: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gsl Development Query
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <14766.58946.215506.562282@localhost>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10008251121190.714-100000@gold> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10008301358480.2913-100000@gold> <14765.18315.291785.105448@localhost> <39AD5CD4.C064ADB3@lanl.gov> <14766.44792.661700.158797@localhost> <39AED103.429A1F5A@lanl.gov>
X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00480.html

Gerard Jungman writes:
 > No. What I have described is an efficient way to
 > obtain the required functionality in GSL.

My basic point: we don't need to put the functionality of FFTW in GSL.
People should just use FFTW if that is what they need. 

BLAS is a separate issue. If we didn't provide a sample BLAS
implementation then GSL would not install out-of-the-box, since BLAS
is used internally in the library. That's the only reason we provide
one.