From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ltconfig in distribution
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15255.48822.975570.945836@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010905190359.A19922@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com>
gsl-discuss@lists.thewrittenword.com writes:
> ltconfig should not be part of the distribution tarball. It matters
> only for libtool 1.3.5 and lower. Also, libtool 1.4.1 just came out
> (with some important fixes for AIX). Would be nice for you to upgrade :)
Ok. I'll use that for future releases.
Does ltconfig cause any harm or is it just redundant? If it doesn't
cause any errors I'll leave it in until I upgrade automake.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-19 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-19 13:20 gsl-discuss
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough [this message]
2001-12-19 13:20 ` gsl-discuss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15255.48822.975570.945836@debian \
--to=bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).