From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: "Jim Love" <Jim.Love@asml.com>
Cc: <gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Singular Value Decomposition Algorithm
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15264.56558.806672.113194@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sba09ba1.005@wiltonhub.svg.com>
Columns 2 and 3 have the opposite sign, but this is the arbitrary
minus-sign factor referred to earlier. The results satisfy m =
u*diag(s)*v' and u'*u = I, v'*v = I numerically --- so the
decomposition looks ok. Let me know if there's something I missing
here.
regards
Brian Gough
Jim Love writes:
> This code fixes the order problem of the S vector and the other matrix, but their is still a sign problem. Using this matrix for A:
>
> 1.000000 1.000000 0.975000
> 1.000000 -1.000000 0.975000
> -1.000000 -1.000000 -0.925000
> -1.000000 1.000000 -1.025000
>
> The modified code produces:
>
> s:
> 2.793961 2.000000 0.035791
>
> This is correct!
>
> For V:
>
> -0.715538 -0.025633 0.698103
> 0.018347 -0.999671 -0.017900
> -0.698332 -0.000000 -0.715774
>
> This is NOT correct!
>
> The correct answer for V is:
>
> -0.7155 0.0256 -0.6981
> 0.0183 0.9997 0.0179
> -0.6983 -0.0000 0.7158
>
> U is also wrong: the program outputs:
>
> -0.493230 -0.512652 -0.493875
> -0.506363 0.487019 0.506368
> 0.480733 0.512652 -0.506047
> 0.518861 -0.487019 0.493554
>
> The correct U is:
>
> -0.4932 0.5127 0.4939
> -0.5064 -0.4870 -0.5064
> 0.4807 -0.5127 0.5060
> 0.5189 0.4870 -0.4936
>
> Note last column missing for both solutions for U.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-19 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <sba09ba1.005@wiltonhub.svg.com>
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough [this message]
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
2001-12-19 13:20 ` James Theiler
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
2001-12-19 13:20 Jim Love
2001-12-19 13:20 ` James Theiler
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Peter Schmitteckert
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15264.56558.806672.113194@debian \
--to=bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
--cc=Jim.Love@asml.com \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).