From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11750 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 15:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11686 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail11.svr.pol.co.uk) (195.92.193.23) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from modem-19.achilles-tang.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.221.19] helo=debian) by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 164O09-0004iM-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:00:25 +0000 Received: from bjg by debian with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 164Nyp-0003sh-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:59:03 +0000 From: Brian Gough MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15347.55350.938075.320053@debian> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000 To: Anton Fokin Cc: smartquant@yahoogroups.com, gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library] In-Reply-To: <3BF38A36.613FBC7B@smartquant.com> References: <200111132351.PAA25299@eskimo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011114103720.00a91ec0@mail.ametrano.net> <3BF24DB0.D9A17D@smartquant.com> <15346.28894.817806.402836@debian> <15346.55014.338864.444835@debian> <3BF38A36.613FBC7B@smartquant.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under Emacs 19.34.1 X-SW-Source: 2001/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Anton Fokin writes: > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is > not under GPL, would it solve your problem? I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of any doubt. Since your project is not free software I can't offer any specific advice apart from that. The safest option is not to use GSL in non-free projects. regards, -- Brian Gough ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Theory Ltd Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309 15 Royal Park WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/ Clifton Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk Bristol BS8 3AL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11750 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 15:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11686 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail11.svr.pol.co.uk) (195.92.193.23) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from modem-19.achilles-tang.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.221.19] helo=debian) by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 164O09-0004iM-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:00:25 +0000 Received: from bjg by debian with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 164Nyp-0003sh-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:59:03 +0000 From: Brian Gough MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15347.55350.938075.320053@debian> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 09:19:00 -0000 To: Anton Fokin Cc: smartquant@yahoogroups.com, gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library] In-Reply-To: <3BF38A36.613FBC7B@smartquant.com> References: <200111132351.PAA25299@eskimo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011114103720.00a91ec0@mail.ametrano.net> <3BF24DB0.D9A17D@smartquant.com> <15346.28894.817806.402836@debian> <15346.55014.338864.444835@debian> <3BF38A36.613FBC7B@smartquant.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under Emacs 19.34.1 X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011109091900.dcNENcVAec-dHjAmgbgNeSmiNHwJYyQlwpUlwYT9nt8@z> Anton Fokin writes: > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is > not under GPL, would it solve your problem? I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of any doubt. Since your project is not free software I can't offer any specific advice apart from that. The safest option is not to use GSL in non-free projects. regards, -- Brian Gough ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Theory Ltd Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309 15 Royal Park WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/ Clifton Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk Bristol BS8 3AL ----------------------------------------------------------------------