1.2 release candidate

1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at

  http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz

Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.

Thanks,

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Andrea Riciputi]

On Sunday, June 30, 2002, at 12:00 AM, Brian Gough wrote:

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Andrea Riciputi]

On Sunday, June 30, 2002, at 12:00 AM, Brian Gough wrote:

> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
>
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
>
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian

Sorry for this late, but I've been very busy this week. My results are 
the following:

%uname -a
Darwin localhost 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26 PDT 
2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC  Power Macintosh powerpc

%cc -v
Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/2.95.2/specs
Apple Computer, Inc. version gcc-934.3, based on gcc version 2.95.2 
19991024 (release)

%env CFLAGS="-Wno-long-double -g -O2" ./configure --disable-shared
OK

%make
OK

%make check
FAILS

Here are the last few lines:

PASS: gsl_sf_eta_e(1.0+1.0e-10, &r)
PASS: gsl_sf_eta_e( 5, &r)
PASS: gsl_sf_eta_e( 5.2, &r)
PASS: gsl_sf_eta_e( 6, &r)
PASS: gsl_sf_eta_e( 20, &r)
PASS: Zeta Functions
PASS: Result Methods
FAIL: test
===================
1 of 1 tests failed
===================
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

The same problem raises with gsl-1.1-1. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Andrea.

---
Andrea Riciputi        <mailto:andrea.riciputi@libero.it>

"Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out,
   but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman)

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Andrea Riciputi writes:
 > %uname -a
 > Darwin localhost 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26 PDT 
 > 2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC  Power Macintosh powerpc
 > 

Thanks, it looks like there are a few small numerical differences on
PowerPC, which is to be expected, so I'll adjust the test tolerances
to take care of them.

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Andrea Riciputi writes:
 > %uname -a
 > Darwin localhost 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26 PDT 
 > 2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC  Power Macintosh powerpc
 > 

Thanks, it looks like there are a few small numerical differences on
PowerPC, which is to be expected, so I'll adjust the test tolerances
to take care of them.

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Slaven Peles]

On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:00 pm, Brian Gough wrote:
> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
>
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
>
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian

I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
off. 

Cheers,
Slaven

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Slaven Peles]

On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:00 pm, Brian Gough wrote:
> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
>
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
>
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian

I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
off. 

Cheers,
Slaven

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Slaven Peles writes:
 > I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
 > reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
 > documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
 > off. 

Thanks.

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Slaven Peles writes:
 > I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
 > reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
 > documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
 > off. 

Thanks.

Failed 1.2 release candidate - check

[Daniel Konkle]

I downloaded the release candidate and get  errors on the Hermitage
stuff.

I did the standard:
./configure
./make
./make check

The make check fails.

I'm running Redhat 7.3 with gcc 2.96 on a Pentium 4

I have the output of make check if someone wants to look at it.

Danny

On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 13:09, Slaven Peles wrote:
> On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:00 pm, Brian Gough wrote:
> > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> >
> >   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> >
> > Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> > GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian
> 
> I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
> reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
> documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
> off. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Slaven

Failed 1.2 release candidate - check

[Daniel Konkle]

I downloaded the release candidate and get  errors on the Hermitage
stuff.

I did the standard:
./configure
./make
./make check

The make check fails.

I'm running Redhat 7.3 with gcc 2.96 on a Pentium 4

I have the output of make check if someone wants to look at it.

Danny

On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 13:09, Slaven Peles wrote:
> On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:00 pm, Brian Gough wrote:
> > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> >
> >   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> >
> > Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> > GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian
> 
> I tested it on GNU/Linux with gcc-2.96-98 (RedHat 7.2), and make check 
> reports only an error in eigen directory, as it has been noted in the 
> documentation. There were no errors reported after optimization was turned 
> off. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Slaven

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > Linux 2.4.18 gcc 3.1.1 with the following problem In file included
 > from test.c:61: " test_complex_source.c: In function
 > `test_complex_float_trap': test_complex_source.c:258: Internal
 > compiler error in subst, at combine.c:3546 Please submit a full bug
 > report, with preprocessed source if appropriate.  See
 > <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html > for instructions.

I think someone was reporting this bug to the gcc developers (check
the gsl list archives for details).

 > I also tested on Solaris/Sparc without success (probably it was my
 > fault about some options)

Can you send the error for a clean "./configure ; make", thanks.

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > Linux 2.4.18 gcc 3.1.1 with the following problem In file included
 > from test.c:61: " test_complex_source.c: In function
 > `test_complex_float_trap': test_complex_source.c:258: Internal
 > compiler error in subst, at combine.c:3546 Please submit a full bug
 > report, with preprocessed source if appropriate.  See
 > <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.

I think someone was reporting this bug to the gcc developers (check
the gsl list archives for details).

 > I also tested on Solaris/Sparc without success (probably it was my
 > fault about some options)

Can you send the error for a clean "./configure ; make", thanks.

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Carlo Perassi]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Brian Gough sent those random bytes:
> Can you send the error for a clean "./configure ; make", thanks.

1)
gcc -v
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

2)
uname -impsrv
SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-15 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60

3)
errors after "./configure; make; make check 2> mylog"

ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC27:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC109:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC110:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC115:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC116:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC115:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotmg.o: symbol .LLC12:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
.LLC109                             test_rotg.o
.LLC110                             test_rotg.o
.LLC115                             test_rotg.o
.LLC116                             test_rotg.o
.LLC5                               test_rotg.o
.LLC12                              test_rotmg.o
.LLC27                              test_rotg.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .libs/test
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test'
Current working directory /home/users/k/ka/kabur/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-am'
Current working directory /home/users/k/ka/kabur/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-recursive'

-- 
Carlo Perassi - http://www.linux.it/~carlo/

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Carlo Perassi]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Brian Gough sent those random bytes:
> Can you send the error for a clean "./configure ; make", thanks.

1)
gcc -v
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

2)
uname -impsrv
SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-15 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60

3)
errors after "./configure; make; make check 2> mylog"

ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC27:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC109:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC110:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC115:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC116:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC115:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotmg.o: symbol .LLC12:
        external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
        cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
.LLC109                             test_rotg.o
.LLC110                             test_rotg.o
.LLC115                             test_rotg.o
.LLC116                             test_rotg.o
.LLC5                               test_rotg.o
.LLC12                              test_rotmg.o
.LLC27                              test_rotg.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .libs/test
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test'
Current working directory /home/users/k/ka/kabur/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-am'
Current working directory /home/users/k/ka/kabur/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-recursive'

-- 
Carlo Perassi - http://www.linux.it/~carlo/

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Olivier Andrieu]

 Brian Gough [Saturday 29 June 2002] :
 > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at

On RedHat Linux 7.3, with an AMD CPU and using gcc 3.1 I get this :

* no optimisation -> make check OK

* -O2 -> make check gives this (same as previously reported) :

test_complex_source.c: In function `test_complex_float_trap':
test_complex_source.c:258: Internal compiler error in subst, at combine.c:3546
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html > for instructions.

* -O -> make check fails on some legendre function :

FAIL: gsl_sf_conicalP_cyl_reg_e(20, 1.0, 0.5, &r)
  expected: 7.066408031229072e-24
  obtained: 7.066408031229079e-24   1.880369398635769e-36  2.661e-13
  fracdiff: 5.198425890615777e-16
  value not within tolerance of expected value
  7.06640803122907946e-24  1.88036939863576925e-36
<snip>
FAIL: Legendre Functions


$ gcc3 --version
gcc3 (GCC) 3.1 20020604 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 3.1-5)

-- 
   Olivier

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Olivier Andrieu]

 Brian Gough [Saturday 29 June 2002] :
 > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at

On RedHat Linux 7.3, with an AMD CPU and using gcc 3.1 I get this :

* no optimisation -> make check OK

* -O2 -> make check gives this (same as previously reported) :

test_complex_source.c: In function `test_complex_float_trap':
test_complex_source.c:258: Internal compiler error in subst, at combine.c:3546
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.

* -O -> make check fails on some legendre function :

FAIL: gsl_sf_conicalP_cyl_reg_e(20, 1.0, 0.5, &r)
  expected: 7.066408031229072e-24
  obtained: 7.066408031229079e-24   1.880369398635769e-36  2.661e-13
  fracdiff: 5.198425890615777e-16
  value not within tolerance of expected value
  7.06640803122907946e-24  1.88036939863576925e-36
<snip>
FAIL: Legendre Functions


$ gcc3 --version
gcc3 (GCC) 3.1 20020604 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 3.1-5)

-- 
   Olivier

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Charles Yee]

Brian Gough wrote:

> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
>
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
>
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian

I compiled and did a make check on this gsl-1.2 release candidate using
Redhat Linux 7.2 and gcc 2.96 without failure.

-Charles

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Charles Yee]

Brian Gough wrote:

> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
>
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
>
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian

I compiled and did a make check on this gsl-1.2 release candidate using
Redhat Linux 7.2 and gcc 2.96 without failure.

-Charles

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Sergei Morozov]

> Brian Gough wrote:
>
> > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> >
> >   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> >
> > Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> > GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian
Compiles and all tests pass on Compaq C V6.4-214 on Tru64 Unix 4.0f.


---
If you wish to be happy for one hour, get drunk.
If you wish to be happy for three days, get married.
If you wish to be happy for a month, kill your pig and eat it.
If you wish to be happy forever, learn to fish.
                -- Mongolian Proverb


Sergei Morozov
Department of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA, 94305-6072
ph: (650)-723-3285 (Hoover Office)
    (650)-498-1248 (home)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBOH8VK3ZlrUSqDLbVAQFHIwP/dYGV0yV2AYoFWWfJDE6WMtYOLjUSebaV
Mzv3ICK2SDPTQ6u3lKx/7VXdY1151pqRZ3Kn7Z8FPZ2KxjRIqeLtOsCMFPRXM234
j23RfBtNPzG2pTOciJvqh0uHxySMR7Dzee+gjniNJadXyE0Y2+C33HICuVVqDH8O
ZEhGny68w7c=
=sz39
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Sergei Morozov]

> Brian Gough wrote:
>
> > I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> >
> >   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> >
> > Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> > GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian
Compiles and all tests pass on Compaq C V6.4-214 on Tru64 Unix 4.0f.


---
If you wish to be happy for one hour, get drunk.
If you wish to be happy for three days, get married.
If you wish to be happy for a month, kill your pig and eat it.
If you wish to be happy forever, learn to fish.
                -- Mongolian Proverb


Sergei Morozov
Department of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA, 94305-6072
ph: (650)-723-3285 (Hoover Office)
    (650)-498-1248 (home)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBOH8VK3ZlrUSqDLbVAQFHIwP/dYGV0yV2AYoFWWfJDE6WMtYOLjUSebaV
Mzv3ICK2SDPTQ6u3lKx/7VXdY1151pqRZ3Kn7Z8FPZ2KxjRIqeLtOsCMFPRXM234
j23RfBtNPzG2pTOciJvqh0uHxySMR7Dzee+gjniNJadXyE0Y2+C33HICuVVqDH8O
ZEhGny68w7c=
=sz39
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Alan Jackson]

On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:00:40 +0100 (BST)
Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk> wrote:

> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> 
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> 
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> 

Solaris 2.8, gcc version 2.95.2 19991024

make finished error free.

make check gave the following errors :

test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:908: undefined reference to `LLC27'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1015: undefined reference to `LLC109'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1024: undefined reference to `LLC110'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1026: undefined reference to `LLC115'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1026: undefined reference to `LLC116'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1093: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1161: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1194: undefined reference to `LLC115'
test_rotmg.o: In function `test_rotmg':
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotmg.c:167: undefined reference to `LLC12'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test'
Current working directory /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-am'
Current working directory /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-recursive'


-- 
Alan K. Jackson - BTC - Quantitative AVO Team
Shell E&P Technology and Research 
voice :(713)245-7355 fax :(713)245-7492 snail :Box 481,Houston,Tx 77001
UUCP: ...!{uupsi}!shell!ajackson INTERNET: ajackson@shell.com

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Alan Jackson]

On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:00:40 +0100 (BST)
Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk> wrote:

> I've put a gsl-1.2 release candidate at
> 
>   http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/gsl-1.1.1+.tar.gz
> 
> Please try it out and let me know if it works.  I have tested it on
> GNU/Linux with gcc-2.95.4.
> 

Solaris 2.8, gcc version 2.95.2 19991024

make finished error free.

make check gave the following errors :

test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:908: undefined reference to `LLC27'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1015: undefined reference to `LLC109'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1024: undefined reference to `LLC110'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1026: undefined reference to `LLC115'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1026: undefined reference to `LLC116'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1093: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1161: undefined reference to `LLC5'
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:1194: undefined reference to `LLC115'
test_rotmg.o: In function `test_rotmg':
/tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotmg.c:167: undefined reference to `LLC12'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test'
Current working directory /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-am'
Current working directory /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `check-recursive'


-- 
Alan K. Jackson - BTC - Quantitative AVO Team
Shell E&P Technology and Research 
voice :(713)245-7355 fax :(713)245-7492 snail :Box 481,Houston,Tx 77001
UUCP: ...!{uupsi}!shell!ajackson INTERNET: ajackson@shell.com

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Alan Jackson writes:
 > make check gave the following errors :
 > test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
 > /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
 > ....

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
 >         external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
 >         cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored

Thanks.  I think this must be a bug in the gcc optimiser for sparc
(for that version of gcc).  Recompiling those two test_rot*.o object
files with optimisation turned off allows the test to pass. I will
have to add that to the release notes.

Brian

Re: 1.2 release candidate

[Brian Gough]

Alan Jackson writes:
 > make check gave the following errors :
 > test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
 > /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
 > ....

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
 >         external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
 >         cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored

Thanks.  I think this must be a bug in the gcc optimiser for sparc
(for that version of gcc).  Recompiling those two test_rot*.o object
files with optimisation turned off allows the test to pass. I will
have to add that to the release notes.

Brian