public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: Alan Jackson <ajackson@shell.com>, Carlo Perassi <carlo@linux.it>
Cc: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 1.2 release candidate
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15650.8791.287369.86607@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020702115301.0b152c87.ajackson@shell.com>

Alan Jackson writes:
 > make check gave the following errors :
 > test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
 > /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
 > ....

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
 >         external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
 >         cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored

Thanks.  I think this must be a bug in the gcc optimiser for sparc
(for that version of gcc).  Recompiling those two test_rot*.o object
files with optimisation turned off allows the test to pass. I will
have to add that to the release notes.

Brian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID

From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: Alan Jackson <ajackson@shell.com>, Carlo Perassi <carlo@linux.it>
Cc: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 1.2 release candidate
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 15:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15650.8791.287369.86607@debian> (raw)
Message-ID: <20020702150100.CdqJi4LhPb9rS25GZAN2vUfWq56a5p0mjF_ga9U39iE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020702115301.0b152c87.ajackson@shell.com>

Alan Jackson writes:
 > make check gave the following errors :
 > test_rotg.o: In function `test_rotg':
 > /tmp/untar/gsl-1.1.1+/cblas/test_rotg.c:889: undefined reference to `LLC5'
 > ....

Carlo Perassi writes:
 > ld: warning: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file test_rotg.o: symbol .LLC5:
 >         external symbolic relocation against non-allocatable section .stab;
 >         cannot be processed at runtime: relocation ignored

Thanks.  I think this must be a bug in the gcc optimiser for sparc
(for that version of gcc).  Recompiling those two test_rot*.o object
files with optimisation turned off allows the test to pass. I will
have to add that to the release notes.

Brian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-31  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-31  9:55 Brian Gough
     [not found] ` <20020630185808.GA345@voyager.perassi.home>
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Brian Gough
2002-07-01 15:24     ` Brian Gough
2002-12-31  9:55     ` Carlo Perassi
2002-07-02  3:02       ` Carlo Perassi
2002-12-31  9:55 ` Olivier Andrieu
2002-07-02 16:06   ` Olivier Andrieu
2002-12-31  9:55 ` Alan Jackson
2002-07-02  9:56   ` Alan Jackson
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Brian Gough [this message]
2002-07-02 15:01     ` Brian Gough
2002-12-31  9:55 ` Charles Yee
2002-07-02 10:03   ` Charles Yee
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Sergei Morozov
2002-07-02 10:47     ` Sergei Morozov
2002-12-31  9:55 ` Slaven Peles
2002-07-01 11:14   ` Slaven Peles
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Brian Gough
2002-07-01 15:24     ` Brian Gough
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Failed 1.2 release candidate - check Daniel Konkle
2002-07-01 15:14     ` Daniel Konkle
2002-12-31  9:55 ` 1.2 release candidate Andrea Riciputi
2002-07-04 16:11   ` Andrea Riciputi
2002-12-31  9:55   ` Brian Gough
2002-07-07 15:27     ` Brian Gough

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15650.8791.287369.86607@debian \
    --to=bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
    --cc=ajackson@shell.com \
    --cc=carlo@linux.it \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).