From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20418 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2002 20:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20411 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 20:08:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.53.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 20:08:58 -0000 Received: from pcow057o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:08:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.73.11]) by pcow057o.blueyonder.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:08:57 +0100 Received: by network-theory.co.uk via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for peles@cns.physics.gatech.edu; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:08:49 +0100 (BST) From: Brian Gough MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15779.15185.88510.157216@debian> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:08:00 -0000 To: Slaven Peles Cc: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Can we close BUG#6 ? In-Reply-To: References: X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 Slaven Peles writes: > I posted this before, but I guess there's no harm repeating it. If > I compile GSL on Compaq Alpha with the additional flag "-ieee" > everything seem to work fine and make check reports that all checks > are passed. So it seems that bug is actually in documentation > only. Thanks, BUG#6 now closed. I'd lost track of the status that one.