* Accuracy query
@ 2003-08-11 19:05 a.beskos
2003-08-12 10:56 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: a.beskos @ 2003-08-11 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gsl-discuss
Dear Madam, Sir
my name is Alexandros Beskos, I'm doing a PhD in the department of mathematics and statistics in Lancaster. My query has to do with the accuracy of the values for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a standard normal distribution and its inverse.
First of all I haven't managed to find a function fot the reverse cdf.
Then for the cdf, is the gsl_sf_erf_Q precise, and in how many decimal digits ?? For, if for example, it is 15-digit accurate, then the outcome gsl_sf_erf_Q(20) will not be precise.
Thank you a lot for your time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Accuracy query
2003-08-11 19:05 Accuracy query a.beskos
@ 2003-08-12 10:56 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2003-08-12 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: a.beskos; +Cc: gsl-discuss
a.beskos@lancaster.ac.uk writes:
> Dear Madam, Sir
> my name is Alexandros Beskos, I'm doing a PhD in the department of mathematics and statistics in Lancaster. My query has to do with the accuracy of the values for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a standard normal distribution and its inverse.
> First of all I haven't managed to find a function fot the reverse cdf.
> Then for the cdf, is the gsl_sf_erf_Q precise, and in how many decimal digits ?? For, if for example, it is 15-digit accurate, then the outcome gsl_sf_erf_Q(20) will not be precise.
See the Special functions chapter in the manual for information on how
to get the error estimates from those functions.
--
Brian Gough
Network Theory Ltd
15 Royal Park
Bristol BS8 3AL
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)117 3179309
Fax: +44 (0)117 9048108
Web: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: Accuracy query
@ 2003-08-12 9:27 keith.briggs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: keith.briggs @ 2003-08-12 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: a.beskos, gsl-discuss
See: http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/math.CA/0306264
The inverse of the cumulative standard normal probability function
Keith
Dr. Keith M. Briggs
Senior Mathematician, Complexity Research, BT Exact
http://research.btexact.com/teralab/keithbriggs.html
(or http://members.lycos.co.uk/keithmbriggs/keithbriggs.html)
phone: +44(0)1473 work: 641 911 home: 610 517 fax: 642 161
mail: Keith Briggs, Polaris 134, Adastral Park, Martlesham, Suffolk
IP5 3RE, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: a.beskos@lancaster.ac.uk [mailto:a.beskos@lancaster.ac.uk]
Sent: 11 August 2003 17:47
To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Accuracy query
Dear Madam, Sir
my name is Alexandros Beskos, I'm doing a PhD in the department of
mathematics and statistics in Lancaster. My query has to do with the
accuracy of the values for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a
standard normal distribution and its inverse.
First of all I haven't managed to find a function fot the reverse cdf.
Then for the cdf, is the gsl_sf_erf_Q precise, and in how many decimal
digits ?? For, if for example, it is 15-digit accurate, then the outcome
gsl_sf_erf_Q(20) will not be precise.
Thank you a lot for your time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12 10:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-11 19:05 Accuracy query a.beskos
2003-08-12 10:56 ` Brian Gough
2003-08-12 9:27 keith.briggs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).