GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911 ) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement ( http://www.smartquant.com/license.html ) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Hi guys,

>GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
>R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.

Well, R-Quant includes the whole source (actually the whole distribution) of
the GSL. Thus I thought we comply with the requirements. Such distribution is
quite convinient for the end users since they do not need to worry about GSL
download/install.

There are three ways to solve this "problem"

- make a special agreement with GSL/GNU team (such possibility is stated on
GPL pages)
- remove GSL distribution from R-Quant package so that all interested users
can download/install it on
  their own. C++ wrappers will still remain.
- remove GSL completely from R-Quant project.

What's your suggestion?

Cheers,
Anton


Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:

> At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
> >we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
> >[omissis]
> >I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.
>
> GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
> R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
> I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence
> agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.
>
> Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Hi guys,

>GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
>R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.

Well, R-Quant includes the whole source (actually the whole distribution) of
the GSL. Thus I thought we comply with the requirements. Such distribution is
quite convinient for the end users since they do not need to worry about GSL
download/install.

There are three ways to solve this "problem"

- make a special agreement with GSL/GNU team (such possibility is stated on
GPL pages)
- remove GSL distribution from R-Quant package so that all interested users
can download/install it on
  their own. C++ wrappers will still remain.
- remove GSL completely from R-Quant project.

What's your suggestion?

Cheers,
Anton


Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:

> At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
> >we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
> >[omissis]
> >I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.
>
> GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
> R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
> I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence
> agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.
>
> Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Hi guys,

>GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
>R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.

Well, R-Quant includes the whole source (actually the whole distribution) of
the GSL. Thus I thought we comply with the requirements. Such distribution is
quite convinient for the end users since they do not need to worry about GSL
download/install.

There are three ways to solve this "problem"

- make a special agreement with GSL/GNU team (such possibility is stated on
GPL pages)
- remove GSL distribution from R-Quant package so that all interested users
can download/install it on
  their own. C++ wrappers will still remain.
- remove GSL completely from R-Quant project.

What's your suggestion?

Cheers,
Anton


Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:

> At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list
> ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911 ) Anton Fokin wrote:
> >we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
> >[omissis]
> >I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.
>
> GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL
> R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
> I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence
> agreement ( http://www.smartquant.com/license.html ) is not GPL compatible.
>
> Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 11:55 AM 11/14/01 +0100, Anton Fokin wrote:
>There are three ways to solve this "problem"
>[omissis]
>What's your suggestion?
My suggestion would be pointless: it's up to the GSL copyright holder, i.e. 
Brian Gough if I'm not wrong.

Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 11:55 AM 11/14/01 +0100, Anton Fokin wrote:
>There are three ways to solve this "problem"
>[omissis]
>What's your suggestion?
My suggestion would be pointless: it's up to the GSL copyright holder, i.e. 
Brian Gough if I'm not wrong.

Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Ok, I am waiting Brian's reaction then.

In any case I think both projects would benefit from such cooperation, so let's
see.

Cheers,
Anton

Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:

> At 11:55 AM 11/14/01 +0100, Anton Fokin wrote:
> >There are three ways to solve this "problem"
> >[omissis]
> >What's your suggestion?
> My suggestion would be pointless: it's up to the GSL copyright holder, i.e.
> Brian Gough if I'm not wrong.
>
> Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Ok, I am waiting Brian's reaction then.

In any case I think both projects would benefit from such cooperation, so let's
see.

Cheers,
Anton

Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:

> At 11:55 AM 11/14/01 +0100, Anton Fokin wrote:
> >There are three ways to solve this "problem"
> >[omissis]
> >What's your suggestion?
> My suggestion would be pointless: it's up to the GSL copyright holder, i.e.
> Brian Gough if I'm not wrong.
>
> Ferdinando Ametrano

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Kenneth Geisshirt]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Anton Fokin wrote:

> There are three ways to solve this "problem"

Actually, there is a fourth solution: put __your__ code under GPL!

Kneth

-- 
Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
GPG Fingerprint: 7424 AF49 AB47 03D4 D7C5  A07C 4D92 37E7 2F92 0B79
Computers are like air conditioners
                     they stop working properly if you open WINDOWS

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Kenneth Geisshirt]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Anton Fokin wrote:

> There are three ways to solve this "problem"

Actually, there is a fourth solution: put __your__ code under GPL!

Kneth

-- 
Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
GPG Fingerprint: 7424 AF49 AB47 03D4 D7C5  A07C 4D92 37E7 2F92 0B79
Computers are like air conditioners
                     they stop working properly if you open WINDOWS

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Well, until we are not sure which kind of (final) license we want to see for
R-Quant (open source/GPL/Qt-like/other) I prefer keeping flexibility in
making such decisions.

Thus we are ready to follow all the requirements like source code
distribution/copyright notes/etc.etc but today we wish to keep R-Quant under
"R-Quant" license agreement.

Cheers,
Anton

Kenneth Geisshirt wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Anton Fokin wrote:
>
> > There are three ways to solve this "problem"
>
> Actually, there is a fourth solution: put __your__ code under GPL!
>
> Kneth
>
> --
> Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
> GPG Fingerprint: 7424 AF49 AB47 03D4 D7C5  A07C 4D92 37E7 2F92 0B79
> Computers are like air conditioners
>                      they stop working properly if you open WINDOWS
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
> Refill any ink cartridge for less!
> Includes black and color ink.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/E11sED/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Well, until we are not sure which kind of (final) license we want to see for
R-Quant (open source/GPL/Qt-like/other) I prefer keeping flexibility in
making such decisions.

Thus we are ready to follow all the requirements like source code
distribution/copyright notes/etc.etc but today we wish to keep R-Quant under
"R-Quant" license agreement.

Cheers,
Anton

Kenneth Geisshirt wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Anton Fokin wrote:
>
> > There are three ways to solve this "problem"
>
> Actually, there is a fourth solution: put __your__ code under GPL!
>
> Kneth
>
> --
> Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
> GPG Fingerprint: 7424 AF49 AB47 03D4 D7C5  A07C 4D92 37E7 2F92 0B79
> Computers are like air conditioners
>                      they stop working properly if you open WINDOWS
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
> Refill any ink cartridge for less!
> Includes black and color ink.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/E11sED/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton,
  I've looked at your license for R-quant and it allows only
non-commercial use, so that would not be compatible with the license
of the GNU Scientific Library.  

  The relevant parts of the GNU GPL are Sections 2 and 3 (in the
COPYING file included with GSL).  There are also some FAQ entries on
the GNU website which discuss this, e.g.

   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLInProprietarySystem

If you need more specific information feel free to ask, but if you
wanted to use GSL in your product you'd need to change the license to
GPL.

best regards,

-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton,
  I've looked at your license for R-quant and it allows only
non-commercial use, so that would not be compatible with the license
of the GNU Scientific Library.  

  The relevant parts of the GNU GPL are Sections 2 and 3 (in the
COPYING file included with GSL).  There are also some FAQ entries on
the GNU website which discuss this, e.g.

   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLInProprietarySystem

If you need more specific information feel free to ask, but if you
wanted to use GSL in your product you'd need to change the license to
GPL.

best regards,

-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton,
I read the follow-up discussions on the smartquant list about GSL
wrappers in R-quant.  I'm not sure what license these wrappers are
under but if it is the R-quant license then there is a problem.

Any distributed code which refers to GSL functions should be licensed
to the end-user under the GPL.  The intent of the GPL is that we make
our code free to other people if they do the same for us --- two-way
cooperation.  The current R-quant license is not a free software
license so there should not be anything distributed under that license
which directly refers to GSL functions.

Thanks,

-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton,
I read the follow-up discussions on the smartquant list about GSL
wrappers in R-quant.  I'm not sure what license these wrappers are
under but if it is the R-quant license then there is a problem.

Any distributed code which refers to GSL functions should be licensed
to the end-user under the GPL.  The intent of the GPL is that we make
our code free to other people if they do the same for us --- two-way
cooperation.  The current R-quant license is not a free software
license so there should not be anything distributed under that license
which directly refers to GSL functions.

Thanks,

-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Brian,

not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
not under GPL, would it solve your problem?

Cheers,
Anton

However, in many cases you can distribute the GPL-covered software alongside
your proprietary system. To do this validly, you must make sure that the free
and
non-free programs communicate at arms length, that they are not combined in a
way that would make them effectively a single program.

The difference between this and "incorporating" the GPL-covered software is
partly a matter of substance and partly form. The substantive part is this:
if the two
programs are combined so that they become effectively two parts of one
program, then you can't treat them as two separate programs. So the GPL has
to cover the
whole thing.

If the two programs remain well separated, like the compiler and the kernel,
or like an editor and a shell, then you can treat them as two separate
programs--but you
have to do it properly. The issue is simply one of form: how you describe
what you are doing. Why do we care about this? Because we want to make sure
the users
clearly understand the free status of the GPL-covered software in the
collection.

If people were to distribute GPL-covered software calling it "part of" a
system that users know is partly proprietary, users might be uncertain of
their rights regarding
the GNU software. But if they know that what they have received is a free
program plus another program, side by side, their rights will be clear.

Cheers,
Anton

Brian Gough wrote:

> Anton,
> I read the follow-up discussions on the smartquant list about GSL
> wrappers in R-quant.  I'm not sure what license these wrappers are
> under but if it is the R-quant license then there is a problem.
>
> Any distributed code which refers to GSL functions should be licensed
> to the end-user under the GPL.  The intent of the GPL is that we make
> our code free to other people if they do the same for us --- two-way
> cooperation.  The current R-quant license is not a free software
> license so there should not be anything distributed under that license
> which directly refers to GSL functions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Brian Gough
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
> 15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
> Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk
> Bristol BS8 3AL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
> Refill any ink cartridge for less!
> Includes black and color ink.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/bAmslD/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Brian,

not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
not under GPL, would it solve your problem?

Cheers,
Anton

However, in many cases you can distribute the GPL-covered software alongside
your proprietary system. To do this validly, you must make sure that the free
and
non-free programs communicate at arms length, that they are not combined in a
way that would make them effectively a single program.

The difference between this and "incorporating" the GPL-covered software is
partly a matter of substance and partly form. The substantive part is this:
if the two
programs are combined so that they become effectively two parts of one
program, then you can't treat them as two separate programs. So the GPL has
to cover the
whole thing.

If the two programs remain well separated, like the compiler and the kernel,
or like an editor and a shell, then you can treat them as two separate
programs--but you
have to do it properly. The issue is simply one of form: how you describe
what you are doing. Why do we care about this? Because we want to make sure
the users
clearly understand the free status of the GPL-covered software in the
collection.

If people were to distribute GPL-covered software calling it "part of" a
system that users know is partly proprietary, users might be uncertain of
their rights regarding
the GNU software. But if they know that what they have received is a free
program plus another program, side by side, their rights will be clear.

Cheers,
Anton

Brian Gough wrote:

> Anton,
> I read the follow-up discussions on the smartquant list about GSL
> wrappers in R-quant.  I'm not sure what license these wrappers are
> under but if it is the R-quant license then there is a problem.
>
> Any distributed code which refers to GSL functions should be licensed
> to the end-user under the GPL.  The intent of the GPL is that we make
> our code free to other people if they do the same for us --- two-way
> cooperation.  The current R-quant license is not a free software
> license so there should not be anything distributed under that license
> which directly refers to GSL functions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Brian Gough
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
> 15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
> Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk
> Bristol BS8 3AL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
> Refill any ink cartridge for less!
> Includes black and color ink.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/bAmslD/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton Fokin writes:
 > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
 > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
 > not under GPL, would it solve your problem?

I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your
responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing
any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of
any doubt.  Since your project is not free software I can't offer any
specific advice apart from that.  The safest option is not to use GSL
in non-free projects.

regards,
-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Brian Gough]

Anton Fokin writes:
 > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
 > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
 > not under GPL, would it solve your problem?

I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your
responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing
any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of
any doubt.  Since your project is not free software I can't offer any
specific advice apart from that.  The safest option is not to use GSL
in non-free projects.

regards,
-- 
Brian Gough

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk    
Bristol BS8 3AL
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Kevin,

could you ask for a legal advise for us ? :)

Cheers,
Anton

Brian Gough wrote:

> Anton Fokin writes:
>  > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
>  > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
>  > not under GPL, would it solve your problem?
>
> I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your
> responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing
> any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of
> any doubt.  Since your project is not free software I can't offer any
> specific advice apart from that.  The safest option is not to use GSL
> in non-free projects.
>
> regards,
> --
> Brian Gough
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
> 15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
> Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk
> Bristol BS8 3AL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Anton Fokin]

Kevin,

could you ask for a legal advise for us ? :)

Cheers,
Anton

Brian Gough wrote:

> Anton Fokin writes:
>  > Not exactly, see lines from GPL FAQ. Moreover, if I distribute libGSL under
>  > GPL (or whatever compatible license) together with R-Quant kernel which is
>  > not under GPL, would it solve your problem?
>
> I'll just have to refer you to my previous message and say it is your
> responsiblity to comply with the license of GSL when redistributing
> any related software --- you may want to take legal advice in case of
> any doubt.  Since your project is not free software I can't offer any
> specific advice apart from that.  The safest option is not to use GSL
> in non-free projects.
>
> regards,
> --
> Brian Gough
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Network Theory Ltd            Phone: +44 (0)117 3179309
> 15 Royal Park                   WWW: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
> Clifton                       Email: bjg@network-theory.co.uk
> Bristol BS8 3AL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement (http://www.smartquant.com/license.html) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano

GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]

[Ferdinando Ametrano]

At 10:20 AM 11/14/01 +0100, on the R-Quant mailing list 
( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smartquant/message/911 ) Anton Fokin wrote:
>we have GSL already included in R-Quant distribution.
>[omissis]
>I will update R-Quant GSL version to the newest one in the next release.

GSL uses the Gnu Public License (GPL). Therefore, if R-Quant includes GSL 
R-Quant should be GPL-ed too.
I might be missing some important point here, but I think R-Quant licence 
agreement ( http://www.smartquant.com/license.html ) is not GPL compatible.

Ferdinando Ametrano