From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13441 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 17:43:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13429 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 17:43:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO camelot.ufrmd.dauphine.fr) (193.51.89.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 17:43:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 17324 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 17:43:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ufrmd.dauphine.fr) (rossi@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 17:43:43 -0000 Message-ID: <3C0BB9CF.B0AEE6FC@ufrmd.dauphine.fr> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:12:00 -0000 From: Fabrice Rossi Organization: Dauphine University X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en, French, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: License References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011128121200.XHWV_CbcYeRUq7kFvDm3BUFaGyOgd9BcSFCaTWBjEow@z> nbecker@fred.net wrote: > > Since GSL is a library, why is is covered by GPL? Because developers decided so. Fascinating, isn't it? And please keep in mind that the L in LGPL is now for Lesser, not Library. You should read http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html. It will help. Fabrice Rossi