From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gsl-discuss-return-1720-listarch-gsl-discuss=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15196 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 13:00:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gsl-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gsl-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15160 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2001 13:00:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.svr.pol.co.uk) (195.92.193.210)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2001 13:00:44 -0000
Received: from modem-42.fu-manchu-lion-fish.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.215.42] helo=debian)
	by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
	id 166tSs-0000iW-00; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:00:27 +0000
Received: from bjg by debian with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 166syG-0000Cx-00; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:28:48 +0000
From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <15356.61311.980505.499480@debian>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Edgar_Gardu=F1o_=C1ngeles?= <edgargar@seas.upenn.edu>
Cc: <gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: make check, FAIL (gsl-1.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111211639540.2286-100000@blue.seas.upenn.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111211639540.2286-100000@blue.seas.upenn.edu>
X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under Emacs 19.34.1
X-SW-Source: 2001/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20011219132000.NCWOkEznw-O_vrgRadA9awe1rpbfEUOZVn78PokOFaU@z>

Edgar Gardu=F1o =C1ngeles writes:
 > I just tried to install gsl-1.0 and compilation goes smoothly, but when I
 > run the 'make check' I get a FAIL message (I include it bellow). I am
 > installing the gsl-1.0 on a PC running RedHat 7.1 (gcc version 2.96
 > 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81) ). Any one with an explanation/hint?
 >=20
 > FAIL: herm(4), eigenvalue(0,3), imag, unsorted (0 observed vs 1.14475010=
141416824e-319 expected)

Thanks for the bug report.  The code is ok but there's an optimization
bug in gcc-2.96.  If you use gcc-3.x it should compile correctly.

regards
Brian Gough