From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 15:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 2801 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 15:38:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net (HELO relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net) (212.159.7.36) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:38:03 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkYHAL4Tp01UXeb6/2dsb2JhbACYOI09d8FPhW4EkWI Received: from outmx05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]) by relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2011 16:38:02 +0100 Received: from [212.159.60.66] (helo=MobileSlave) by outmx05.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1QAOcL-00081I-Fj for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:38:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2F6C8DD90FBE49DEB5AE8CB08D7B1A2E@MobileSlave> From: "Brian Gladman" To: Subject: GSL 1.15 Test Release Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:38:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code). I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this C99 feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is not an oversight. with my regards, Brian Gladman