* GSL 1.15 Test Release
@ 2011-04-14 15:38 Brian Gladman
2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gladman @ 2011-04-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gsl-discuss
I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I
notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of
order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this C99
feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is
not an oversight.
with my regards,
Brian Gladman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
@ 2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
2011-04-14 18:58 ` Brian Gladman
2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2011-04-14 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Gladman; +Cc: gsl-discuss
At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
>
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
>
> I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this C99
> feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is
> not an oversight.
If you have a list I'd like to fix them in the source. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
@ 2011-04-14 18:58 ` Brian Gladman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gladman @ 2011-04-14 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Gough; +Cc: gsl-discuss
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Gough
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:43 PM
To: Brian Gladman
Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
>
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out
> of
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
>
> I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this
> C99
> feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is
> not an oversight.
If you have a list I'd like to fix them in the source. Thanks.
==========
Thanks - I'll draw up a list and get back to you asap.
Brian Gladman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
@ 2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2011-04-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Gladman; +Cc: gsl-discuss
At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
>
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
>
I think I've fixed all these in the bzr repository now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-16 23:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
2011-04-14 18:58 ` Brian Gladman
2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).