public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net>
To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: interfacing GSL Pop11/Poplog
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B19A313.73DB627D@netwood.net> (raw)

Aaron Sloman wrote:

> The proposal is that a "popgsl" package
> could also become available
> with documentation and interfaces to the GSL facilities
> including hand-coded or automatically generated wrappers.
> This is analogous to the way Pop-11 currently has access
> to all the X facilities, i.e. through Pop-11 procedures
> which invoke the C procedures.
> 
> People using this popgsl package
> would probably obtain GSL separately,
> though there might be some benefit
> in providing pre-compiled saved images for some users
> (or making a stable version of GSL available
>  at the Poplog site).

The GSL developers just aren't there yet.

The hope is, as I understand it, that
the GSL API will be more or less fixed
with the release of version 1.0
The GSL developers really haven't considered
any language bindings except for ANSI C yet.
It isn't clear whether they will ever support
any other language bindings.
I guess that they would try to support C++
and Fortran 90 language bindings first
because they are the most popular languages
for numerical computing.

It might take another year or two
before the GSL developers can consider
other language bindings
but that shouldn't prevent you
from beginning work now
on a language binding for Pop-11.
You just need to expect that
any interface that you might implement
will require constant maintenance
as the GSL continues to evolve.

             reply	other threads:[~2001-12-19 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-19 13:20 E. Robert Tisdale [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-19 13:20 Aaron Sloman
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B19A313.73DB627D@netwood.net \
    --to=edwin@netwood.net \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).