public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GSL 1.15 Test Release
@ 2011-04-14 15:38 Brian Gladman
  2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
  2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gladman @ 2011-04-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gsl-discuss

I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I 
notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of 
order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).

I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this C99 
feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is 
not an oversight.

    with my regards,

         Brian Gladman

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
  2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
@ 2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
  2011-04-14 18:58   ` Brian Gladman
  2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2011-04-14 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Gladman; +Cc: gsl-discuss

At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
> 
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I 
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of 
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
> 
> I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this C99 
> feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is 
> not an oversight.

If you have a list I'd like to fix them in the source. Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
  2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
@ 2011-04-14 18:58   ` Brian Gladman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gladman @ 2011-04-14 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Gough; +Cc: gsl-discuss

-----Original Message----- 
From: Brian Gough
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:43 PM
To: Brian Gladman
Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release

At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
>
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out 
> of
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
>
> I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this 
> C99
> feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is
> not an oversight.

If you have a list I'd like to fix them in the source. Thanks.

==========
Thanks - I'll draw up a list and get back to you asap.

    Brian Gladman



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release
  2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
  2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
@ 2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2011-04-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Gladman; +Cc: gsl-discuss

At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100,
Brian Gladman wrote:
> 
> I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I 
> notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out of 
> order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code).
> 

I think I've fixed all these in the bzr repository now.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-16 23:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-14 15:38 GSL 1.15 Test Release Brian Gladman
2011-04-14 16:43 ` Brian Gough
2011-04-14 18:58   ` Brian Gladman
2011-04-16 23:01 ` Brian Gough

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).