From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2916 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 11:04:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2907 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 11:04:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (HELO relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net) (212.159.7.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:04:16 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsHALsnikrUnw4T/2dsb2JhbACOWslihBkFgU4 Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.19]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2009 12:04:13 +0100 Received: from [212.159.60.66] (helo=[192.168.1.11]) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1MdMU9-0008PP-0F; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:04:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4A8A8AAD.3050709@gladman.plus.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:04:00 -0000 From: Brian Gladman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Gough CC: "gsl-discuss@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: GSL test release 1.12.90 References: <4A854F64.9050006@gladman.plus.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Plusnet-Relay: c06581fc3cfba6619185b57efe1f7396 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 Brian Gough wrote: > At Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:49:56 +0100, > Brian Gladman wrote: >> I had two compile errors: >> >> 1. I found declarations after executable statements in test_funcs.c >> (spring_f) >> >> 2. In gsl_const_cgs.h, the MSVC preprocessor does not recognise the >> #warning directive. > > Thanks for the testing. > >> The test that fails is testrandist, which gives this output in 64-bit mode: >> >> GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,round-to-nearest,mask-all" >> FAIL: test gsl_ran_exponential [0,1] >> (0 observed vs 0.393469 expected) [7] >> > > Thanks - it looks like the header file is missing in > randist/exponential.c for gsl_log1p. Yes, that fixed it. Thanks Brian. Brian Gladman __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4344 (20090818) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com