From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32494 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2009 21:54:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 32486 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2009 21:54:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MISSING_HEADERS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from proxy3.bredband.net (HELO proxy3.bredband.net) (195.54.101.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:54:32 +0000 Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (195.54.127.164) by proxy3.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 4AD3E1BA01883E8B for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:54:29 +0100 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AotMAIOrH0tV5WwyPGdsb2JhbACBTJc8glMBAQEBN7p9hCwE Received: from c-326ce555.210-11-64736c16.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO signori.local) ([85.229.108.50]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2009 22:54:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4B201C92.7090304@chiralcomp.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:54:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari_H=E4kkinen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: using GSL with C++ (was Re: gsl container designs) References: <1259110486.3028.69.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <4B20105C.3080501@fnal.gov> In-Reply-To: <4B20105C.3080501@fnal.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 I use GSL exclusively from C++. I cannot remember when I wrote C ... probably 12-13 years has passed since I did my last (latest?) C consultancy gig. Jari James Amundson wrote: > On 12/04/2009 12:36 PM, Brian Gough wrote: >> At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:46 -0700, >> Gerard Jungman wrote: >> >>> Here are header files for a couple different approaches to containers. >> Regarding the introductory points. >> >> 2a+b) While we may have had some kind of goal of supporting C++ I >> don't think it's worth encouraging that today as the gap between the >> languages has widened so much since the start of the project. >> > > I, for one, use GSL almost exclusively from C++. When I'm not using > C++, I am usually using Python. How are other readers of this list > using GSL? Are you using a pure C environment, or do you use C++ > and/or other languages? > > I have no interest in debating the relative merits of various > languages; I am just curious to know what is happening in practice. > > --Jim Amundson