From: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr>
To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B83B2FC.7000502@sophia.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87aav0kit7.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
On 02/22/2010 11:27 PM, Brian Gough wrote:
> At Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:58:06 -0700,
> Gerard Jungman wrote:
>
>> You guys are missing the point. The question is not
>> "autotools or nothing" but "autotools or cmake".
>>
> As Robert says, it's a question of standardisation. I have nothing
> against cmake, on a purely techical level it may be better but
> autotools is the defacto standard and that is worth more in practice.
>
>
Well, just to add my 2cents. The world is changing and cmake is becoming
very fast
the standard. Many projects have switched to it. One of the major
advantage is that
it works under windows out of the box...
I'm saying that all the more that I used to be an autotools convinced
guy (and not very statisfied
by cmake some time ago), but cmake is progressing rapidly. As said above
quite a few
opensource projects adopted it and it is taken into account in many
distro build system.
I can't believe I'm saying that, but it's true...
All the best,
Theo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4a00655d1002171047t4e87fb85w88b609245e3f9a8e@mail.gmail.com>
2010-02-19 8:48 ` Field G. Van Zee
2010-02-18 19:51 ` Rhys Ulerich
2010-02-19 0:20 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-19 20:22 ` Brian Gough
2010-02-19 0:00 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-20 4:30 ` Field G. Van Zee
2010-02-23 13:13 ` Brian Gough
2010-02-24 1:42 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-19 18:19 ` Brian Gough
2010-02-19 18:41 ` Robert G. Brown
2010-02-19 20:57 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-19 21:46 ` Robert G. Brown
2010-02-19 22:34 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-22 23:09 ` Brian Gough
2010-02-23 10:50 ` Theodore Papadopoulo [this message]
2010-02-23 14:55 ` Robert G. Brown
2010-02-24 1:50 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-24 11:31 ` Robert G. Brown
2010-02-23 17:39 ` James Amundson
2010-02-19 20:07 ` Brian Gough
2010-02-19 20:54 ` Gerard Jungman
2010-02-20 4:31 ` Field G. Van Zee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B83B2FC.7000502@sophia.inria.fr \
--to=theodore.papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).