From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23428 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2009 18:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 23401 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2009 18:40:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f228.google.com) (209.85.219.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:39:57 +0000 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so3637122ewy.24 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.10.76 with SMTP id 54mr1747712weu.58.1244918394471; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Rhys Ulerich Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4a00655d0906131139y1bd3a168x36fc1d113d73d870@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Licensing question To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Hi all, I've got a licensing question. An individual has some nice routines that I believe fill gaps in the GSL integration functionality. These routines are LGPL. Is it possible for the individual to make a GPL/LGPL one-off release that could be pulled into GSL without "screwing up" the LGPL licensing he currently uses? Specifically, could he continue to update and release his own routine modifications under only the LGPL? - Rhys