From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31522 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2009 15:34:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 31511 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2009 15:34:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iw0-f195.google.com (HELO mail-iw0-f195.google.com) (209.85.223.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:34:13 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so886723iwn.24 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.22.38 with SMTP id l38mr11372528ibb.34.1252337651581; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <48E25CA9.6080306@iki.fi> <498727E5.6080407@iki.fi> <49AA9DB5.6030908@iki.fi> <49FB01D1.30000@iki.fi> <4A7ADFDC.9080408@iki.fi> <1251414774.23092.80.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <1251414939.23092.82.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> From: Rhys Ulerich Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4a00655d0909070833q65730bbcgf44546478ff04be3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 > We could adopt FLAME, which is a much more general framework, C-based > and faster than LAPACK. =A0I really think this is a better way to go > than LAPACK. =A0Unfortunately it doesn't have so many routines at the > moment. +1 on the idea. The FLAME developers would probably be willing to fill in the gaps if it meant having FLAME underneath GSL 2.0. They're nice folks, and they love displacing LAPACK. - Rhys