From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9590 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2010 23:10:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9580 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2010 23:10:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:10:08 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so8337040fxm.8 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:10:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.5 with SMTP id a5mr5543661bks.109.1266448205369; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:10:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1266446869.8015.201.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> References: <4B3F0184.2030505@iki.fi> <1266363451.8015.153.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <87aav7r2u4.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <1266446869.8015.201.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> From: Rhys Ulerich Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4a00655d1002171509h276d70a5j7be3dab439daa358@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: libflame version 4.0 announced To: GSL Discuss Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 > But this requires some kind of interface design. With > BLAS we were lucky that a standard C interface existed > already. But it's not so clear what a "standard" LAPACK > interface would look like. FWIW, there's an attempt at a "standard" LAPACK interface over at the Intel Software Forums [1] aiming to be a CBLAS-for-LAPACK. It has been silent for awhile though. - Rhys [1] http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=61234