From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26154 invoked by alias); 24 May 2013 19:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26144 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2013 19:36:59 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,MISSING_HEADERS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ipmx6.colorado.edu (HELO ipmx6.colorado.edu) (128.138.128.246) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:54 +0000 From: Patrick Alken X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFANa/n1GMrLMp/2dsb2JhbABagwi/cIJuGW4WdIIjAQEFOEABEAsYCRMDDwkDAgECAUUTAQcBARCHebJgiBePHQeDVAOJH5QnizWDLh0 Received: from bonanza.ngdc.noaa.gov ([140.172.179.41]) by smtp.colorado.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA; 24 May 2013 13:36:52 -0600 Message-ID: <519FC153.7030503@colorado.edu> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "gsl-discuss@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: new GSL version References: <519F8EAE.6010102@colorado.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 I have a laptop running Mac OS X 10.6, and just ran make check on the latest repository with no errors. Does anyone have failures they can send to me? On 05/24/2013 10:38 AM, Rhys Ulerich wrote: > > > I think its time to make a new release of GSL (v1.16). There have > been a number of bugfixes and new features added in the last couple > years. I don't mind taking the lead on this... > > Thank you. > > I know of nothing critical but believe we want to have make check come > back clean at default optimization on OS X. It has not, I think due to > SVD tolerances, for some time. Do we have some sort of GNU-provided > continuous integration server available on which these types of > portability issues might be flushed out on an ongoing basis? > > I very much like your idea of just collecting up the bug reports and > moving on. Some sort of a post release bug fix effort would do well to > harness people's interest in contributing so that we might add some > pep to the community. > > - Rhys >