From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8353 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2014 22:14:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8343 invoked by uid 89); 5 Nov 2014 22:14:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: proofpoint4.lanl.gov Received: from proofpoint4.lanl.gov (HELO proofpoint4.lanl.gov) (204.121.3.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:14:57 +0000 Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by mailgate4.lanl.gov (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sA5MEtmh003216 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:14:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7390E9942E for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:14:55 -0700 (MST) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Received: from manticore.lanl.gov (manticore.lanl.gov [130.55.124.157]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE91E992B8 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:14:55 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <545AA15F.3010908@lanl.gov> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:14:00 -0000 From: Gerard Jungman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: bad paragraph Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-11-05_08:2014-11-05,2014-11-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Sorry. The third paragraph, starting with "Any client who", is not what I meant to say. It does not make sense as written. What I meant was: "Any user of a true const-correct view type would be forced..." GSL does not provide a true const-correct type, so the criticism is not of GSL as such, but of the implied const-correctness idea and its incompatibility with GSL interface design. -- G. Jungman