public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Alken <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: Multiprecision arithmetic
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Yes for now I think it would add too much complexity to GSL, so we 
prefer to use double precision.

Thanks for your work on the recent bugs - I haven't had a chance to look 
at the patches but I'm hoping to get to this soon.


On 11/24/2015 07:18 AM, Bill Maier wrote:
> I notice than in the write-up for bug #45746 it is suggested that multiprecision
> arithmetic be used in a portion of the calculation to produce a more precise
> result. Is this something that would be considered in GSL? I did a search
> through the code for mpfr or gmp and did not find either. In fact I couldn't find
> any code where multiprecision arithmetic is currently being used. Is it GSL
> policy to keep all internal calculations in double precision?
> -Bill Maier

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 14:18 Bill Maier
2015-11-24 16:00 ` Patrick Alken [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).