From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4971 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2007 15:42:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 4952 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2007 15:42:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from network-theory.com (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:42:00 +0000 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <876404vnp6.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> From: Brian Gough To: GSL Discussion list Subject: Re: nonsymm eigenvalues... In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: 5326dba51df1313affe7bda9ab9df168 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:58:48 -0500 (EST), Robert G. Brown wrote: > Also, what is likely to happen if I call the symmetric routines for a > nonsymmetric matrix? They seem to "work" and still produce eigenvalues > and eigenvectors. Are those garbage? It just uses the lower triangular part and assumes symmetry, anything in the upper triangular part is ignored. -- Brian Gough