From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 836 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2008 20:47:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 828 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2008 20:47:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:47:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87bpzzi8k8.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> From: Brian Gough To: "Robert G. Brown" Cc: GSL Discussion list Subject: Re: RNG question In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: 38f724508ce7762894221a7cb437914c Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 At Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:28:07 -0400 (EDT), Robert G. Brown wrote: > Are future/new rngs going to always be added at the end (new numbers) or > will they get inserted in typed groupings? They could go anywhere, the order is not guaranteed to be preserved. -- Brian Gough