From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13876 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2009 11:46:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 13868 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2009 11:46:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:46:53 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87fx7jm4sp.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> From: Brian Gough To: James Amundson Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: using GSL with C++ (was Re: gsl container designs) In-Reply-To: <4B20105C.3080501@fnal.gov> References: <1259110486.3028.69.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <4B20105C.3080501@fnal.gov> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: dc93719dd4722a630b5df021e99b0b31 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 At Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:02:20 -0600, James Amundson wrote: > I, for one, use GSL almost exclusively from C++. When I'm not using C++, > I am usually using Python. How are other readers of this list using GSL? > Are you using a pure C environment, or do you use C++ and/or other > languages? What types of functions do you mainly use? The impedance mismatch for the "higher-order" functions, e.g. using functions arguments and void * parameters, seems to be the problematic area to me.