From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2006 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 13:58:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 1997 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2009 13:58:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:58:32 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87my5kvylm.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> From: Brian Gough To: Gerard Jungman Cc: GSL Discuss Mailing List Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) In-Reply-To: <1251414939.23092.82.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> References: <48E25CA9.6080306@iki.fi> <490DE4BD.7070907@iki.fi> <497B00F6.2080400@iki.fi> <498727E5.6080407@iki.fi> <49AA9DB5.6030908@iki.fi> <49FB01D1.30000@iki.fi> <4A7ADFDC.9080408@iki.fi> <1251414774.23092.80.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <1251414939.23092.82.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: a0879c434f0d4e415bc8396fcf855ebe Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Interesting... it may take me a while to read this properly and reply as I am on the road now. I guess the main point I would add is that we have to operate under constraints, compared to LAPACK etc we don't have people funded to work on these things the way they do. So there is a question of whether we want to try to change that aspect, or just make technical changes. -- Brian