From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gsl-discuss-return-5278-listarch-gsl-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28625 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2008 21:08:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 28616 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2008 21:08:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:08:15 +0000
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:08:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87tzicjbr8.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: jgmbenoit@mailsnare.net
Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: chebyshev and specfunc: naive question
In-Reply-To: <47FA0ABF.4040104@mailsnare.net>
References: <47FA0ABF.4040104@mailsnare.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Message-Mac: b88d35d00cd00152cc91ae10507aec6a
Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gsl-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gsl-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gsl-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

At Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:51:27 +0800,
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I have gone through the specfunc  sources:
> why an ad hoc chebyshev package is used rather than
> the one provided by GSL itself ?  

So that it can be static-inlined, and to use gsl_sf_result.