* Consistently naming anonymous structs
@ 2014-04-24 20:45 Rhys Ulerich
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rhys Ulerich @ 2014-04-24 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gsl-discuss
Anyone know how badly things break if we changed things like
typedef struct
{
const gsl_rng_type * type;
void *state;
}
gsl_rng;
to
typedef struct gsl_rng
{
const gsl_rng_type * type;
void *state;
}
gsl_rng;
so that some of our opaque types might be forward declared in C++ code?
- Rhys
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-04-24 20:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-24 20:45 Consistently naming anonymous structs Rhys Ulerich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).