From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10497 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 18:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10483 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 18:58:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (HELO relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net) (212.159.7.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:58:09 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4BAGFDp01UXeb6/2dsb2JhbACXfI19d8JDhW4EkWI Received: from outmx05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2011 19:58:08 +0100 Received: from [212.159.60.66] (helo=MobileSlave) by outmx05.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1QARk0-00013P-3E; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:58:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Brian Gladman" To: "Brian Gough" Cc: References: <2F6C8DD90FBE49DEB5AE8CB08D7B1A2E@MobileSlave> <43vcygokax.wl%bjg@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <43vcygokax.wl%bjg@gnu.org> Subject: Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:58:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 -----Original Message----- From: Brian Gough Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:43 PM To: Brian Gladman Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GSL 1.15 Test Release At Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:37:56 +0100, Brian Gladman wrote: > > I have just had a quick look at this on Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 and I > notice failures when compiling in C as a result of the use of C99's 'out > of > order' declarations (which VC++ doesn't support for C code). > > I can deal with these but, before doing so, I wanted to check that this > C99 > feature is now acceptable in GSL code and that the use of this feaature is > not an oversight. If you have a list I'd like to fix them in the source. Thanks. ========== Thanks - I'll draw up a list and get back to you asap. Brian Gladman