From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19578 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2002 06:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19571 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2002 06:29:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bio.vu.nl) (130.37.80.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2002 06:29:27 -0000 Received: from ursus.bio.vu.nl (ursus [130.37.80.249]) by bio.vu.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05707 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:29:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (fleur@localhost) by ursus.bio.vu.nl (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g7A6TNc18046 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:29:23 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ursus.bio.vu.nl: fleur owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 23:29:00 -0000 From: Fleur Kelpin X-X-Sender: fleur@ursus To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gsl_vector_const_view: pointer to constant or constant pointer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 Hi again! Obviously the point I missed is that there are no pointers being used so moving the const inside the struct makes no difference at all. Next time I'll drink my coffee first, then post to the list. Greetings, Fleur