public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Theiler <jt@lanl.gov>
To: Faheem Mitha <faheem@email.unc.edu>
Cc: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>, <gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: calculating matrix inverses (was Re: modifying matrix allocationfunctions for use with R)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101146240.977-100000@yks.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101334010.24042-100000@Chrestomanci>

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Faheem Mitha wrote:

]
]
] On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Brian Gough wrote:
]
] > Faheem Mitha writes:
]
] >  > Incidentally, it is a little awkward to compute the inverse of a matrix,
] >  > since this involves calling both int gsl_linalg_LU_decomp and int
] >  > gsl_linalg_LU_invert. Would it not be useful to have a "wrapper" function
] >  > which uses both together?
] >
] > Maybe, but in this case computing the inverse matrix is not something
] > I want to encourage, as it's usually better to solve Ax=b instead.
]
] This is an odd thing to say. I want to calculate the inverse of
] (HH^t)^{-1} H, where H is a given matrix, as part of simulating from a
] multivariate normal distribution (the given expression is the mean).  How
] does this correspond to solving a linear system? I assume you mean here
] that A is a matrix and x and b are vectors? I seem to have no option in
] this case but to use gsl_linalg_LU_decomp aned gsl_linalg_LU_invert. If
] there are any other options I would appreciate being made aware of them.
]
]                                    Sincerely, Faheem Mitha.
]

This is getting away from software and API design and into numerical
methods, but for this kind of thing, singular value decomposition is
probably a better tool.  It's a little more expensive than LU, but you
have a lot more control over the stability of the estimated inverse.

jt

---------------------------------------------
James Theiler                     jt@lanl.gov
MS-D436, NIS-2, LANL        tel: 505/665-5682
Los Alamos, NM 87545        fax: 505/665-4414
----- Space and Remote Sensing Sciences -----


  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-19 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-19 13:20 modifying matrix allocation functions for use with R Faheem Mitha
2001-12-19 13:20 ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20   ` Faheem Mitha
2001-12-19 13:20     ` Brian Gough
2001-12-19 13:20       ` calculating matrix inverses (was Re: modifying matrix allocationfunctions for use with R) Faheem Mitha
2001-12-19 13:20         ` James Theiler [this message]
2001-12-19 13:20           ` Faheem Mitha
2001-12-19 13:20 ` modifying matrix allocation functions for use with R Timothy H. Keitt
2001-12-19 13:20 calculating matrix inverses (was Re: modifying matrix allocationfunctions for use with R) Edwin Robert Tisdale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101146240.977-100000@yks.lanl.gov \
    --to=jt@lanl.gov \
    --cc=bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
    --cc=faheem@email.unc.edu \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).