From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1302 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2010 14:55:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 1283 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2010 14:55:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu (HELO mail.phy.duke.edu) (152.3.182.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:54:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.phy.duke.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C47780AD; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:54:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.phy.duke.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id OjrttYEaNs6r; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:54:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from user-152-3-159-194.wireless.duke.edu (user-152-3-159-194.wireless.duke.edu [152.3.159.194]) by mail.phy.duke.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC853780A1; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:54:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:55:00 -0000 From: "Robert G. Brown" To: Theodore Papadopoulo cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0 In-Reply-To: <4B83B2FC.7000502@sophia.inria.fr> Message-ID: References: <4a00655d1002171047t4e87fb85w88b609245e3f9a8e@mail.gmail.com> <4B7D90B5.4020707@cs.utexas.edu> <87y6ipozqi.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <1266613086.27033.124.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <87aav0kit7.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <4B83B2FC.7000502@sophia.inria.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > I'm saying that all the more that I used to be an autotools convinced guy > (and not very statisfied > by cmake some time ago), but cmake is progressing rapidly. As said above > quite a few > opensource projects adopted it and it is taken into account in many distro > build system. > > I can't believe I'm saying that, but it's true... Well, when I next have time to mess with it I'll see if I can port my own major projects to it -- again. Last time it was a disaster. I don't suppose they provide an "autotools2cmake" utility, do they? rgb > > All the best, > > Theo. > Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb@phy.duke.edu