From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: Gideon Simpson <simpson@math.toronto.edu>
Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: DHT performance
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33aba3e4m.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21FF16B9-8781-4C1E-BC11-0C90C4123DE0@math.toronto.edu>
At Sat, 9 May 2009 20:34:08 -0400,
Gideon Simpson wrote:
>
> Am I right that the DHT algorithm is not *fast* in the sense that it's
> O(N^2)?
I believe that's true, yes. As I understand it, the advantage is that
the overall constant in the runtime is small due to everything being
precomputed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-10 7:51 Gideon Simpson
2009-05-12 8:44 ` Brian Gough [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m33aba3e4m.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
--to=bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
--cc=simpson@math.toronto.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).