From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14177 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2009 20:12:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14153 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2009 20:12:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:12:24 +0000 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: Brian Gough To: Gerard Jungman Cc: GSL Discuss Mailing List Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) In-Reply-To: <1253062021.23092.954.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> References: <48E25CA9.6080306@iki.fi> <490DE4BD.7070907@iki.fi> <497B00F6.2080400@iki.fi> <498727E5.6080407@iki.fi> <49AA9DB5.6030908@iki.fi> <49FB01D1.30000@iki.fi> <4A7ADFDC.9080408@iki.fi> <1251414774.23092.80.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <1251414939.23092.82.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <1253062021.23092.954.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: 1fc3a7f65bc6bb1ec3d86d6a3de27ead Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 At Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:47:01 -0600, Gerard Jungman wrote: > The first real step would be to refactor so that all the commonality > in methods is better exposed. There are too many places where the > same continued fraction method or series summation method is > being applied, with only slight variation. But I digress. If that can be done without changes to the external interface them I am certainly in favour of it. -- Brian