From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6311 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2009 10:08:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 6302 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2009 10:08:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:08:39 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: Brian Gough To: Brian Gladman Cc: "gsl-discuss@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: GSL test release 1.12.90 In-Reply-To: <4A854F64.9050006@gladman.plus.com> References: <4A854F64.9050006@gladman.plus.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: de2e41d850a788d3ca4932b46f00153b Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 At Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:49:56 +0100, Brian Gladman wrote: > I had two compile errors: > > 1. I found declarations after executable statements in test_funcs.c > (spring_f) > > 2. In gsl_const_cgs.h, the MSVC preprocessor does not recognise the > #warning directive. Thanks for the testing. > The test that fails is testrandist, which gives this output in 64-bit mode: > > GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,round-to-nearest,mask-all" > FAIL: test gsl_ran_exponential [0,1] > (0 observed vs 0.393469 expected) [7] > Thanks - it looks like the header file is missing in randist/exponential.c for gsl_log1p. -- Brian Gough