From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gsl-discuss-return-5349-listarch-gsl-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10413 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2008 02:48:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 13670 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2008 21:19:12 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.network-theory.co.uk (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:18:08 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3fxn4cfws.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
From: Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
To: GSL Discuss Mailing List <gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: simplicity vs. efficiency of algorithms in GSL
In-Reply-To: <1223597049.14338.126.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>
References: <200809221621.54890.emanuele.passera@treuropa.com>
	<20080922162507.GA29877@hippogriff.homeunix.org>
	<48D7E476.2010000@iki.fi>
	<20080922195029.GA9060@hippogriff.homeunix.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0809221659420.4000@lilith.rgb.private.net>
	<1222206451.30638.62.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>
	<m3hc85xn1t.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
	<1222301240.30638.146.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>
	<m3skrm4m4p.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
	<9ACA4123-675A-43C1-9200-F0AABB076117@googlemail.com>
	<1223413980.14338.96.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>
	<48EE4F5F.7000707@iki.fi>
	<1223597049.14338.126.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Message-Mac: f88cf5cb9333daaee81f1d0257adb0d2
Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gsl-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gsl-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gsl-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

At Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:04:09 -0600,
Gerard Jungman wrote:
> It may be too soon to have a party, but I'm excited about the
> following, which was just brought to my attention. The ten-year
> wait may soon be over.
> 
>   http://icl.cs.utk.edu/~delmas/lapwrapc.html
> 
> It's a draft standard for a C LAPACK interface.

Interesting, but it's column major only.