From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3735 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2007 19:59:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 3727 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2007 19:59:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from network-theory.com (HELO mail.network-theory.co.uk) (66.199.228.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:59:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: Brian Gough To: Sergei Poselenov Cc: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Failure building GSL-1.9 on FPU-less powerpc In-Reply-To: <46D3E1CA.9030700@emcraft.com> References: <46CD3DF1.9000605@emcraft.com> <46D3E1CA.9030700@emcraft.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Message-Mac: 55b2cab4580a1e4b08a930d1d7e28b8b Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 At Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:50:18 +0400, Sergei Poselenov wrote: > Don't you think the system-wide fpu-control.h for fpu-less > systems should have _FPU_RC_NEAREST and others defined for > compatibility? They already have there: > > #define _FPU_GETCW(cw) 0 > #define _FPU_SETCW(cw) do { } while (0) You'd have to ask on the GNU C Library mailing list about that I guess. If there is a simple patch to GSL that simplifies the compilation without breaking anything, you could send it here. -- Brian Gough