From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27254 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 23:23:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-emacs-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-emacs-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27217 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 23:23:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lackawana.kippona.com) (207.8.195.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 23:23:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (chrisb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lackawana.kippona.com (8.12.2.Beta3/8.12.2.Beta3/Kippona) with ESMTP id g0HNN80B012831; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:23:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020117.182307.56681257.chrisb@kippona.com> To: knishida@sky.sannet.ne.jp Cc: guile-emacs@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: emacs-guile From: Chris Beggy In-Reply-To: References: <20020117.172547.106805003.chrisb@kippona.com> X-fingerprint: 6012 F8F8 29B2 67E4 0604 BCD2 F882 88AE 8060 510A X-gpgkeyID: 0x8060510A X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.51 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 From: Keisuke Nishida > At Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:25:47 -0500 (EST), > Chris Beggy wrote: > > > > While trying emacs-guile-0.2 and emacs21.1, guile-1.4, I > > couldn't even get very simple expressions to evaluate in the > > scheme-interaction-mode: > > > > (guile-lisp-eval '(+ 1 2)) > > > > gives: > > > > cond: Guile error: unbound-variable, "Unbound variable: > > guile-lisp-eval" > > In scheme-interaction-mode, what you type is evaluated by Guile. > That is, (guile-lisp-eval '(+ 1 2)) is evaluated by Guile, and > Guile throws an error because guile-lisp-eval is not defined in > Guile. > > So, try simply > > (+ 1 2) > > Hopes this helps. Yes, thanks! That works. I am so confused... I thought these libraries would help me: 1. use elisp libraries in scheme 2. let me use scheme libraries to do functions in emacs, like manipulating buffers and so on. am I completely wrong? Chris