From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keisuke Nishida <kxn30@po.cwru.edu>
To: John Wiegley <johnw@gnu.org>
Cc: guile-emacs@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: frames and windows
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:49:00 -0000
Message-id: <m34s9pzshb.fsf@kei.cwru.edu>
References: <m33dpaaetq.fsf@kei.cwru.edu> <m03dpazhso.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> <87r9cugjp4.fsf@PC486.Niemitalo.LAN>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00074.html

John Wiegley <johnw@gnu.org> writes:

> > What about renaming them in terms of GTK+ when we use Emacs Scheme?
> > I know this is very confusing and controversial, but I would choose
> > renaming because it will help people after ten years.
> 
> It's a question of whether you pick GTK or Emacs as the basis for
> nomenclature.  I would recommend the latter.

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <tosi@ees2.oulu.fi> writes:

> I believe it is easier to keep the frontier between Emacs and
> window systems.  If someone uses guile-gtk to create a GTK+
> window, [s]he can't use that as an Emacs frame anyway.

Right.  I guess I shouldn't resist the tradition...