From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keisuke Nishida <kxn30@po.cwru.edu>
To: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <tosi@ees2.oulu.fi>
Cc: guile-emacs@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Emacs Scheme interface
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:09:00 -0000
Message-id: <m3ity5s1qh.fsf@kei.cwru.edu>
References: <m3ln33ege5.fsf@kei.cwru.edu> <87ln33uu6l.fsf@PC486.Niemitalo.LAN> <m38zz2lu8c.fsf@kei.cwru.edu> <87snxagkf9.fsf@PC486.Niemitalo.LAN>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00076.html

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <tosi@ees2.oulu.fi> writes:

> > I think everything in Scheme should be organized in the way of Scheme,
> > including the naming style.
> 
> Naming style -- do you mean the question marks, or something else?

Something like that (? for predicate, ! for side effect, etc).
What could I way?  Naming scheme?

> > Does Guile have any macro like `save-excursion'?
> 
> Actually, Guile has `save-module-excursion' which takes a thunk
> parameter.  So I suppose `save-excursion' should take a thunk,
> and the convenient macro (if we provide one) should be called
> something else like `begin-save-excursion'.

I agree with this.  And your implementation looks good.  Thanks!

-- Kei