From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7467 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2002 12:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7460 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 12:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ouse.qinetiq.com) (192.102.214.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 12:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15699 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 13:59:14 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO dart.qinetiq.com) (10.0.5.21) by ouse.qinetiq.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 13:59:14 +0100 Received: from allen.qinetiq.com (not verified[10.0.20.10]) by dart.qinetiq.com with MailMarshal (4,2,5,0) id ; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 13:59:14 +0100 Received: (qmail 26640 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 13:59:13 +0100 Received: from tay.qinetiq.com (10.0.20.12) by allen.qinetiq.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 13:59:13 +0100 Received: (qmail 29638 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 13:59:13 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO rhubarb.qinetiq.com.qinetiq.com) (10.208.80.57) by tay.qinetiq.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 13:59:13 +0100 From: Dave Lambert To: Clinton Ebadi Cc: Marius Vollmer , guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com, guile-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: guile-gtk-1.2 0.31 has been released References: <87ptvvc6qe.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <200209031722.51029.unknown_lamer@unknownlamer.org> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 05:59:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20020905055900.uRUBv_l3WmgwWj6K1TOLkAiJR5K6t5CPO_UNvTiIRxI@z> >>>>> Clinton Ebadi writes: | Are you going to work any on guile-gobject any? I talked to Ariel | and he said he couldn't get it to work with the latest Gtk+ (it | segfaults somewhere). I've tried to debug it myself, but I can't I have been working on guile-gobject in slow (very slow) time, and have it working reasonably well. I've also managed to port most of the guile-gtk-1.2 gtk support. I'll try and get something packaged up for Monday, and hopefully someone else with more time/talent can take it on. Dave -- Pitman's Two-Bit Rule: when representing two bits of information, use two bits to do it. -- Kent Pitman