From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27719 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 21:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27708 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 21:33:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.254.0.216) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 8 Apr 2003 21:33:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 7160 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 21:33:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faust.local) ([66.93.48.245]) (envelope-sender ) by mail16.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Apr 2003 21:33:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 21:33:00 -0000 From: David Pirotte To: Andreas Rottmann Cc: stan@altosw.be, ariel@gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, mvo@zagadka.de, guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al Message-Id: <20030408161816.599d8e99.david@altosw.be> In-Reply-To: <871y0clq2u.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark> <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> <20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be> <871y0clq2u.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> Organization: Alto Air Services [http://www.altosw.be/aas/] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On 08 Apr 2003 21:57:45 +0200 Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Stan Pinte writes: > > [quote of Ariel, confusing me about wether there is 2.0 porting work > at all] > > > hello, > > > > I would really like to start using the gnome-canvas with > > guile-1.6.3, and guile-gtk-1.2.31 > > > > can anyone point me to the easiest way to do it? > > > > shall I merge the old sources coming from the gnome-guile project in > > the Gnome CVS? shall I rewrite a binding from scratch using g-wrap? > > > > thanks a lot for guidance, > > > I really wonder why so few people seem interested in GTK+ 2.0 > bindings. I'd love to have Goops-based bindings for 2.0 (OO is really > nice, if not necessary ;-) when dealing with widget sets IMO), and > could lend a hand from time to time. I really really would like to have goops-based any bindings, but Gtk+ 2.0 would be a must, I backup the idea Thanks David