From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guile-gtk-return-635-listarch-guile-gtk=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20709 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 14:02:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:guile-gtk-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/guile-gtk/>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20671 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 14:02:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO amsfep16-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.26)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 14:02:36 -0000
Received: from pablo ([62.205.73.200]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nl
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id <20030507140235.KEBE6143.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@pablo>;
          Wed, 7 May 2003 16:02:35 +0200
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:02:00 -0000
From: Stan Pinte <stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
To: Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de>
Cc: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com,Ariel Rios <ariel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al
Message-Id: <20030507154227.2778f673.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
In-Reply-To: <20030507144720.703b50f1.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark>
	<1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx>
	<20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be>
	<20030506083224.6f7ed86c.stan@altosw.be>
	<lj1xzc5buz.fsf@troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
	<20030506172451.7a79df7b.stan@altosw.be>
	<20030507144720.703b50f1.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2

On Wed, 7 May 2003 14:47:20 +0200
Stan Pinte <stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> wrote:

> 
> hello,
> 
> I managed to compile gnome-guile, by fixing some typos in some Makefile.in, and here is what I get when trying an example:
> 
>  /opt/guile-exp/bin/guile --debug -s canvas-test.scm
> 
> stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile/guile-gnome/examples 120 $ /opt/guile-exp/bin/guile -s canvas-test.scm 
> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-func:
> ERROR: /opt/guile-exp//lib/libguile-ltdl.so.1: undefined symbol: gnome_init_guile_glue
> stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile/guile-gnome/examples 121 $ 
> 
> 
> (I enclosed debug output below)
> 
> any clue? because strace tells me that the program has opened the library:
---------------+


A first clue is that gnome-guile, in the GNOME CVS, uses a slightly different gtk/dynlink.scm file, which relies on tk/dynlink-old.scm ....

(define-public (merge-compiled-code init-func libname)
  (cond 
   (gtkconf-using-ltdl
    (let* ((module (current-module))
	   (interface (module-public-interface module)))
      ;; make the new primitives visible from within the current module.
      (module-use! module interface) ; XXX - is this safe?
      (save-module-excursion
       (lambda ()
	 (set-current-module interface)
	 (load-extension libname init-func)))))
   (else
    (merge-compiled-code-old init-func libname))))

the question are: what does gtkconf-using-ltdl means? should merge-compiled-code-old be re-integrated in the guile-gtk CVS?

thanks,

Stan.