From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guile-gtk-return-637-listarch-guile-gtk=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13266 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 14:38:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:guile-gtk-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/guile-gtk/>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13253 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 14:38:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO amsfep12-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 14:38:39 -0000
Received: from pablo ([62.205.73.200]) by amsfep12-int.chello.nl
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id <20030507143838.MVTM6336.amsfep12-int.chello.nl@pablo>;
          Wed, 7 May 2003 16:38:38 +0200
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:38:00 -0000
From: Stan Pinte <stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
To: Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de>
Cc: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com,Ariel Rios <ariel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al
Message-Id: <20030507161829.418538f4.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
In-Reply-To: <ljfznq4zl9.fsf@troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark>
	<1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx>
	<20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be>
	<20030506083224.6f7ed86c.stan@altosw.be>
	<lj1xzc5buz.fsf@troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
	<20030506172451.7a79df7b.stan@altosw.be>
	<20030507144720.703b50f1.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
	<20030507154227.2778f673.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be>
	<ljfznq4zl9.fsf@troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

On 07 May 2003 16:10:26 +0200
Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de> wrote:

> Stan Pinte <stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> writes:
>=20
> > the question are: what does gtkconf-using-ltdl means? should
> > merge-compiled-code-old be re-integrated in the guile-gtk CVS?
>=20
> No, the 'old' code is for very old versions of Guile that didn't use
> libtldl.
>=20
> Are you sure that the gnome_guile_init function really is in the
> library?=20=20


stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile 5 $ grep -nr "gnome_init_guile_glue"=
 .
grep: ./guile-gtk/.#guile-gtk.c: Aucun fichier ou r=E9pertoire de ce type
./guile-gnome/gnome.scm:5:(merge-compiled-code "gnome_init_guile_glue" "lib=
guilegnome")
./guile-gnome/gnome.defs:1346: (init-func "gnome_init_guile_glue")
./guile-gnome/gnome.defs.guile:7: (init-func "gnome_init_guile_glue")
stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile 6 $=20

--> and indeed, as you suspected it is not exported in libguilegnome:

stan@pablo:/opt/guile-exp/lib 12 $ nm libguilegnome.a | grep init
         U _gnome_config_init_iterator
000024c0 T gnome_init_guile_support
         U gnome_init_with_popt_table
00001980 t gnome_uiinfos_class_init
000019b0 t gnome_uiinfos_init
000013a0 t guile_gnome_init_hack
0000013c d sgnome_init_hack
stan@pablo:/opt/guile-exp/lib 13 $ ls


Next step: if this symbol is not exported, does it means that the gnome.def=
s file is wrong (because it contains the wrong function name), or does it m=
ean that there is an unimplemented function...I should add to gnomeg.c ???

Don't know...honestly.

Stan.


The tricky thing normally is to get the library to be
> loaded, but that works already.
>=20


--=20
+----------------   Stanislas Pinte   ------------------+
|              phone: +32 2 732 13 94		        |
|             email:	 stan.pinte@wanadoo.be         	|
+-------------------------------------------------------+