From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8359 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 15:17:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8245 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 15:17:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amsfep16-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.26) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 15:17:01 -0000 Received: from pablo ([62.205.73.200]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP id <20030507151701.MKCH6143.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@pablo>; Wed, 7 May 2003 17:17:01 +0200 Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 15:17:00 -0000 From: Stan Pinte To: Stan Pinte Cc: Marius Vollmer ,guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com,Ariel Rios Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al Message-Id: <20030507165652.2c807020.stan@altosw.be> In-Reply-To: <20030507161829.418538f4.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark> <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> <20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be> <20030506083224.6f7ed86c.stan@altosw.be> <20030506172451.7a79df7b.stan@altosw.be> <20030507144720.703b50f1.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> <20030507154227.2778f673.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> <20030507161829.418538f4.stan.pinte@wanadoo.be> Organization: Alto Software Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 another clue may be the new guile version: In the file gnome-glue.c (and in some others), I had to comment out the fol= lowing, at the end of the file: //Backtrace: //abort: (unbound-variable) Stan. On Wed, 7 May 2003 16:18:29 +0200 Stan Pinte wrote: > On 07 May 2003 16:10:26 +0200 > Marius Vollmer wrote: >=20 > > Stan Pinte writes: > >=20 > > > the question are: what does gtkconf-using-ltdl means? should > > > merge-compiled-code-old be re-integrated in the guile-gtk CVS? > >=20 > > No, the 'old' code is for very old versions of Guile that didn't use > > libtldl. > >=20 > > Are you sure that the gnome_guile_init function really is in the > > library?=20=20 >=20 >=20 > stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile 5 $ grep -nr "gnome_init_guile_glu= e" . > grep: ./guile-gtk/.#guile-gtk.c: Aucun fichier ou r=E9pertoire de ce type > ./guile-gnome/gnome.scm:5:(merge-compiled-code "gnome_init_guile_glue" "l= ibguilegnome") > ./guile-gnome/gnome.defs:1346: (init-func "gnome_init_guile_glue") > ./guile-gnome/gnome.defs.guile:7: (init-func "gnome_init_guile_glue") > stan@pablo:~/src/guile/exp/gnome-guile 6 $=20 >=20 > --> and indeed, as you suspected it is not exported in libguilegnome: >=20 > stan@pablo:/opt/guile-exp/lib 12 $ nm libguilegnome.a | grep init > U _gnome_config_init_iterator > 000024c0 T gnome_init_guile_support > U gnome_init_with_popt_table > 00001980 t gnome_uiinfos_class_init > 000019b0 t gnome_uiinfos_init > 000013a0 t guile_gnome_init_hack > 0000013c d sgnome_init_hack > stan@pablo:/opt/guile-exp/lib 13 $ ls >=20 >=20 > Next step: if this symbol is not exported, does it means that the gnome.d= efs file is wrong (because it contains the wrong function name), or does it= mean that there is an unimplemented function...I should add to gnomeg.c ??? >=20 > Don't know...honestly. >=20 > Stan. >=20 >=20 > The tricky thing normally is to get the library to be > > loaded, but that works already. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > +---------------- Stanislas Pinte ------------------+ > | phone: +32 2 732 13 94 | > | email: stan.pinte@wanadoo.be | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ >=20 --=20 +---------------- Stanislas Pinte ------------------+ | Sales Director | | |=20 | Alto Software sprl | | http://www.altosw.be/ |=20 | | | cell: 32 476 340 841 | | email: stan@altosw.be | +-------------------------------------------------------+