From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8307 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 14:08:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8238 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 14:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.254.0.211) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 24 May 2003 14:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25505 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 14:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pablo.altosw.be) ([66.93.48.245]) (envelope-sender ) by mail11.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 May 2003 14:08:43 -0000 Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:08:00 -0000 From: Stan Pinte To: Andy Wingo Cc: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The GTK2 line of development Message-Id: <20030524000841.30f8d5df.stan@altosw.be> In-Reply-To: <20030524114111.GC24132@lark> References: <20030524114111.GC24132@lark> Organization: Alto Software Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On Sat, 24 May 2003 12:41:11 +0100 Andy Wingo wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm curious about the place of the GTK2 line of development within the > whole guile-gtk project. It seems that some folks are not interested in > GTK2 at all -- is this right? In that case, we have two separate > projects (and in fact they share hardly any code, although I have used > some ideas, as well as event-repl.scm from guile-gtk) and should put > them in different places. What's the deal? > > I suppose we can enumerate some options, > > - within savannah.nongnu.org > * has the advantage that all guile-gtk stuff is in the same place > (maybe it's an advantage, who knows) I would favor that option, as I just moved the (gnome guile) code from the Gnome CVS to the savannah Guile-gtk project. (All the (gnome guile) code is in a separate module, under http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/guile-gtk/gnome-guile-0.1/ Maybe the naming of the module needs some refactoring, we can discuss that. > > - in gnome cvs > * keeps continuity with guile-gobject 0.2.0, although that work was > likely placed in gnome cvs just out of convenience for martin > > - where else? those seem to be the options. we could do sourceforge, > but that's subject to the whims of va software; that doesn't seem as > stable as savannah > > In any case, the web page needs cleaning and updating so that we can > make sense out of this mess. And that tarball really needs to make it > into CVS somewhere. > > Also, we need to decide on some module namespace issues, don't we? Right > now all the GNOME 2 side is under (gnome). So we have (gnome gobject), > (gnome gtk), (gnome gstreamer) [see gst-guile in gstreamer cvs], etc. Is > this ok? > > Can we get some input in here from those working on the 1.2 side of > things as well as from 2.x? The sooner this gets settled, the sooner we > can get some good work (and play) done :-) > > regards, > > wingo. >