From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10437 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 06:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10409 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2003 06:51:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imf47bis.bellsouth.net) (205.152.58.150) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2003 06:51:08 -0000 Received: from fridge ([68.154.193.135]) by imf47bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.25 201-253-122-122-125-20020815) with ESMTP id <20030602065322.NPXZ2907.imf47bis.bellsouth.net@fridge> for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 02:53:22 -0400 Received: from lark (mantis.schoolnet.na [::ffff:196.44.140.238]) (AUTH: LOGIN wingo) by fridge with esmtp; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 02:50:40 -0400 Received: from wingo by lark with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19KM1g-000430-00 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 18:44:48 +0100 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 06:51:00 -0000 From: Andy Wingo To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The GTK2 line of development Message-ID: <20030526174448.GC6014@lark> Mail-Followup-To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com References: <20030524114111.GC24132@lark> <20030524000841.30f8d5df.stan@altosw.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030524000841.30f8d5df.stan@altosw.be> X-Operating-System: Linux lark 2.4.20 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On Sat, 24 May 2003, Stan Pinte wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2003 12:41:11 +0100 > Andy Wingo wrote: > > > - within savannah.nongnu.org > > * has the advantage that all guile-gtk stuff is in the same place > > (maybe it's an advantage, who knows) > > I would favor that option, as I just moved the (gnome guile) code from > the Gnome CVS to the savannah Guile-gtk project. (All the (gnome guile) > code is in a separate module, under > http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/guile-gtk/gnome-guile-0.1/ Sounds reasonable. The developers on this codebase will probably be mainly guile hackers rather than gnome hackers, so that seems about right. Then we just have to figure out package names and module names. The gtk-1.2 code uses the module name (gtk gtk), if I'm not mistaken. See the previous email for my thoughts on namespaces -- there's no collision here, in my eyes. The guile-gnome code that was in gnome-guile-0.10 (I am getting confused now) uses the module (gnome gnome). Hmm... I guess ideally(tm) I would like the (gnome ...) namespace to be reserved for the 2.x version. That does conflict with the current naming of your project, does it not? Still, if you continue to use (gnome guile) and submodules, there shouldn't be any problems. The win-win situation would be to coerce you to join 2.x development, hehehe ;-) Do I have a correct summary of the situation? regards, wingo.