From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2563 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 10:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2289 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2003 10:06:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amsfep14-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2003 10:06:40 -0000 Received: from pablo.altosw.be ([62.205.73.200]) by amsfep14-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP id <20030602100639.PAZX17933.amsfep14-int.chello.nl@pablo.altosw.be> for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:06:39 +0200 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 10:06:00 -0000 From: Stan Pinte To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The GTK2 line of development Message-Id: <20030601200641.1b285ab6.stan@altosw.be> In-Reply-To: <20030526174448.GC6014@lark> References: <20030524114111.GC24132@lark> <20030524000841.30f8d5df.stan@altosw.be> <20030526174448.GC6014@lark> Organization: Alto Software Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 On Mon, 26 May 2003 18:44:48 +0100 Andy Wingo wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Stan Pinte wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 May 2003 12:41:11 +0100 > > Andy Wingo wrote: > > > > > - within savannah.nongnu.org > > > * has the advantage that all guile-gtk stuff is in the same place > > > (maybe it's an advantage, who knows) > > > > I would favor that option, as I just moved the (gnome guile) code from > > the Gnome CVS to the savannah Guile-gtk project. (All the (gnome guile) > > code is in a separate module, under > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/guile-gtk/gnome-guile-0.1/ > > Sounds reasonable. The developers on this codebase will probably be > mainly guile hackers rather than gnome hackers, so that seems about > right. Then we just have to figure out package names and module names. > > The gtk-1.2 code uses the module name (gtk gtk), if I'm not mistaken. > See the previous email for my thoughts on namespaces -- there's no > collision here, in my eyes. The guile-gnome code that was in > gnome-guile-0.10 (I am getting confused now) uses the module (gnome > gnome). Hmm... > > I guess ideally(tm) I would like the (gnome ...) namespace to be > reserved for the 2.x version. That does conflict with the current naming > of your project, does it not? Still, if you continue to use (gnome > guile) and submodules, there shouldn't be any problems. Currently, the naming used are the following: (gnome gnome). I agree to change it to (gnome guile) as soon as it compiles and runs ok... > > The win-win situation would be to coerce you to join 2.x development, > hehehe ;-) I'ld really like to have a first working version of the gnome bindings, rather than migrate the whole stuff now...but no problem for migratring toward 2.x afterwards. > > Do I have a correct summary of the situation? Yes, Stan. > > regards, > > wingo. >